🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."